KODEIT KODEITPre-K Curriculum
Explore curriculum Request a demo
24 September 2026

How to Design Developmental Rubrics for Preschool: Describe the Learning, Don’t Rank the Child

A four-year-old is at the sand tray. He tips a cup into a funnel and the sand jams. He taps the funnel, tries again, then widens the opening with his fingers. His teacher, standing close by, holds a rubric that asks her to rate “problem-solving” as Excellent, Good, Fair or Needs Improvement.

Which box describes what she just saw?

None of them. There was no finished work to grade. She saw a strategy change in real time. That is the design problem with rubrics borrowed from older classrooms, where a rubric scores a product. In preschool, the real evidence is how a child thinks.

What a developmental rubric is (and isn’t)

What is a developmental rubric for preschool?

It is a set of descriptions of what a skill looks like at different stages of growth, written as behaviour a teacher can observe. Teachers match what they see over time to a description. The aim is to show progress and guide the next step, not to grade or rank a child.

A general teacher-education overview from Study.com separates three rubric types:

  • Analytic: a detailed grid, slow to build.
  • Holistic: one scale, usually 1 to 4, fast but thin on feedback.
  • Developmental: good for tracking progress, but hard to write without solid knowledge of how the skill grows.

Early years needs the third type, and that difficulty is why design matters.

What the sources say

Strong early-years assessment does not begin with a score. It begins with a clear learning goal, observable evidence and repeated observation over time.

The Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF) provides a useful model. Its learning goals are organised through developmental progressions and observable indicators, showing how children’s skills can become more complex with experience and support. Head Start also describes assessment as an ongoing process: teachers observe and document learning over time, then use that information to adjust teaching, curriculum and individual support.

For rubric designers, the implication is important. A descriptor should not say that a child is “good at problem-solving” or “below expectations”. It should describe

what the child does, how independently they do it and what kind of evidence would show further development.

The CDC developmental milestone checklists reinforce another important principle: describe behaviours that can actually be seen or heard. But they also establish a clear boundary. The CDC states that its milestones are not developmental standards and should not be used as screening or diagnostic tools. A classroom rubric should follow the same boundary: it can help teachers document learning and plan what comes next, but it should not be used to diagnose delay or label a child’s overall development.

Together, these sources point to a practical design rule:

Describe the learning behaviour, record the conditions in which it appears, look for a pattern over time, and use the evidence to decide what experience should come next.

That is very different from assigning a child a score.

Source: NIEER, The State of Preschool 2025, national quality standards checklist.

The pattern matters for rubric design. Standards and curriculum requirements may be relatively widespread, but the professional learning and improvement systems that help teachers interpret those expectations consistently are less universal. A well-written rubric therefore cannot stand alone. Teachers also need examples, opportunities to compare judgements and feedback on how they are using the tool.

Start with the objective, then write what you can see

Design backwards. Take one learning objective and ask what a teacher would see or hear if a child were progressing. For “solves problems while building”, that could be adjusting the plan after a failure, asking for help with a specific problem, or explaining what changed. Doing this first is what it means to align preschool assessment with learning objectives. Otherwise the rubric measures whatever is easiest to see.

Keep to three or four criteria. Describe behaviour, not personality. “Is confident” cannot be observed, but “joins a small group and takes a turn without a reminder” can. Preschool.org’s show-and-tell example includes keeping the body still. Is that communication, or compliance?

Describe levels as stages of evidence

Levels should show what the evidence looks like, not how good a child is. This is an illustrative model for one criterion, “adjusts strategy after a setback”. It is an example, not an official KODEIT scale.

LevelWhat the evidence may look like
1. Not yet seenAfter the tower falls, the child stops or waits for an adult to rebuild it.
2. Emerging, with supportRebuilds when the teacher asks, “What could we change?”
3. Increasing independenceRebuilds and widens the base without a prompt during this activity.
4. Consistent and transferredUses the same idea in a new build, such as a ramp or a wall, and explains it in their own words.

Level 3 tells the teacher something useful: the strategy has appeared, but only here. The next step is a new context, not more blocks. The same child may be at level 4 in blocks and level 2 in pretend play, so the levels describe evidence in a context, not the child. Choosing how many levels to use is a design decision of its own; see the four-point developmental scale.

Test it with two teachers

Give two teachers the same descriptor and the same week of observation. If they choose different levels, is the child inconsistent, or is the rubric? Pilot with one unit, add an example of evidence to each level, then revise. Because teacher training varies so widely (see the sources above), rubric design and teacher support have to be planned together.

Where rubrics go wrong

  • Too many criteria, so teachers hunt for boxes instead of watching children.
  • Descriptors that describe the ideal child, so most children look behind.
  • Levels read as a ranking or an age-linked pass mark.
  • A rubric used where a checklist would do. If a skill is simply present or not, a checklist is faster. See observation checklists vs rubrics.

A rubric is only worth what it changes

For curriculum teams, the tests are practical. Can two teachers reach the same judgement from the same evidence? Is each rubric tied to an objective? How many minutes does it add per child? Does the result change what happens next?

A rubric that stops at a level, without helping teachers plan the next learning steps, is a record rather than an assessment. Vendor guides such as KindieDays say parents increasingly ask for evidence of learning. That is a market claim, not research, but it shows why rubric output often ends up in parent reports.

Inside a wider early years assessment framework, a rubric earns its place only if it helps teachers see learning without interrupting play. The more useful question may not be “How many levels?” but “What will a teacher do differently on Monday because of this descriptor?”

Where KODEIT Pre-K fits

Good rubric design depends on the curriculum around it. In KODEIT Pre-K, each Teacher Book lists age-appropriate, measurable learning objectives and includes an Assessment & Observation section with rubrics, checklists and reflection tools. The KODEIT Pre-K overview also lists 90+ structured rubrics for tracking developmental progress, alongside formative and summative evaluations that include observations, portfolio tasks and milestone tracking. The supplied materials do not publish the level wording of these rubrics, so the four-level model above is an illustration, not a KODEIT scale.

FAQs

How many levels should a preschool rubric have?
Three or four is usually practical. Fewer than three can hide small steps of growth. More than four asks teachers to make distinctions that everyday observation may not support. Each level needs a written description and an example.

What is the difference between a checklist and a rubric?
A checklist records whether a skill is seen. A rubric describes how the skill develops across stages. Use a checklist for clear yes-or-no skills, such as using a fork, and a rubric where quality grows, such as explaining an idea.

Can a developmental rubric identify a developmental delay?
No. A classroom rubric records evidence of learning in context. The CDC states that its own milestone checklist is not a substitute for a validated developmental screening tool. If a teacher has concerns, they should follow their school’s referral process.

RESOURCES USED